Unraveling Agreement

- April 14, 2021

“Adjustment policy” the way forward for Bahrain`s democracy can be defined as the relationship or balance between state power and individual freedom. If so, a democratic system of government can take many forms. Bahrain has an excellent constitution that supports its development phase, gives it a constitutional monarchy and a nascent parliamentary system and develops political conventions in the last three parliaments, with fundamental, economic and social rights for its citizens. Over the past decade, great strides have been made in the royal reform project and the 2030 economic vision. I think the way forward is housing policy. Each group will strive to work for the emancipation of its supporters. Heads of state or government, strong in their positions, can conclude agreements and agreements, taking into account the interests of the nation first. Peaceful negotiations are the only way forward. The study of historical repositories can support the process. With existing institutions and national dialogue, Bahrain can reach widely supported or unanimous solutions. Lebanese political sectarianism was refined and adopted by the independence movement in November 1943 by the so-called National Pact, an unwritten agreement that laid the foundations for a sectarian system in the post-independence Republic. Surprisingly, the pact survived the civil war from 1975 to 1990.

The conflict began in part because of calls for the abolition of political bigotry. Nevertheless, political sectarianism was reaffirmed and even consolidated in the 1989 agreement on the Taif, also known as the document of national unification. In this regard, Lebanon has the illustrious privilege of having been a pioneer in the creation of a system based on sectarianism, and also a laboratory that emphasizes its dysfunctions and limitations. A widely held view of contractual freedom is that when it comes to agreements between consenting parties, almost everything is at issue. Although contractual freedom limits the government or other forms of interference or control over freely and reciprocally convened agreements,1 contracts remain limited by law. Thus, if the performance, education or purpose of an agreement is against the law, the treaty itself is illegal.2 In 2018, the Trump administration has asked South Korea to increase its annual contribution to the cost of hosting U.S. troops on its soil. South Korea agreed to pay nearly $1 billion, up from $800 million the previous year. But Trump was not satisfied, and in 2019 he claimed $5 billion.

South Korea opposed it and proposed to increase its contribution to $1.3 billion.